Research · Validation Data

NeuroAutomata Validation Results

Published · Updated

Benchmark validation results for the NeuroAutomata scoring engine againstProteinGymassays and additional internal validation runs.

Historical Phase-1 validation— superseded.See methodology for the current verified cohort →

About This Data

NeuroAutomata uses ESM-2 (650M, Meta AI) to score the functional impact of amino acid substitutions.Metric: Spearman rank correlation (ρ) between predicted scores and experimental fitness values. ρ ranges from −1 to 1; higher values indicate better rank-ordering of mutations by effect.

Baseline: Cross-model category medians from the live ProteinGym leaderboard CSV (OATML-Markslab/ProteinGym, accessed 2026-05-08). Original benchmark design: Notin et al. 2023, NeurIPS. The CALM1 result (ρ = 0.212) falls well below ESM-2 650M's own published aggregate of 0.414 — a documented binding-affinity limitation.

Raw per-variant scoring outputs are available on request:team@axonagentic.ai

↓ Download CSV
ProteinAssayDatasetρESM-2 BaselineNotes
Beta-lactamase(BLAT)Enzymatic activity
BLAT_ECOLX_Stiffler_2015
Stiffler et al. 2015
5-Protein Benchmark0.7310.417
BRCA1SGE activity
BRCA1_HUMAN_Findlay_2018
Findlay et al. 2018
5-Protein Benchmark0.5150.417
Calmodulin(CALM1)Binding
CALM1_HUMAN_Weile_2017
Weile et al. 2017
5-Protein Benchmark0.2120.414Well below ESM-2 650M's own published aggregate — confirms protein-protein binding as a known weak category
PTENOrganismal fitness
PTEN_HUMAN_Mighell_2018
Mighell et al. 2018
5-Protein Benchmark0.5190.384
UBC9Expression
UBC9_HUMAN_Weile_2017
Weile et al. 2017
5-Protein Benchmark0.4730.417
Protein G B1 domain(GB1)Fitness (single mutants)
Olson et al. 2014
n = 1,045
Pre-validation0.276Pre-benchmark signal check. p < 10⁻¹⁹. Not included in 5-protein median.
CYP2C9Heme-binding domain
Axon Agentic CYP2C9 benchmark
CYP2C90.811
CYP2C9Overall (pharmacogenomic)
Axon Agentic CYP2C9 benchmark
CYP2C90.679
CYP2C9SRS5 substrate recognition site
Axon Agentic CYP2C9 benchmark
CYP2C90.422~2× performance gap vs heme-binding domain
5-protein benchmark (aggregate)Median across all 5 assays
Internal validation
Aggregate0.515Median across the 5-protein internal validation subset

ρ values in amber are below the ESM-2 category baseline for that assay type. Baselines: cross-model category medians from the ProteinGym leaderboard CSV (OATML-Markslab/ProteinGym, accessed 2026-05-08).